HISTORICAL RECORD
Historical Sources and Evidence
These sources provide historical context. They do not necessarily support the quantities or cooking times in the modern adaptation.
Registered as a reconstruction based on sources. Distinguish the source's account from inference and modern adjustments.
Statements supported by sources
Inference and interpretation
- Segmented loaves and a perimeter groove inspire the shape, but the groove’s purpose and when any cord was applied are uncertain. Central marks were not a universal specification; the image’s mark is illustrative.
- The manuscript’s museum number, Celer stamp and findspot have not been matched independently and are not asserted here. The proposal is not to eat a carbonised artefact.
Modern adjustments
- The 400g flour mixture, yeast, water, timings, oven and twine shaping are modern choices, not a precise ancient formula or a recipe established from Pliny. Additional steam or a water tray is not required.
- Untested and not tasted. One loaf is proposed; timing, yield and texture have not been verified.
- Contains wheat. Do not eat raw flour or dough; bake through the centre. Avoid burns from the tray and remove every piece of shaping twine before eating.
Sources and references
- Parco archeologico di Pompei: Antiquarium, Room I — Carbonised BreadOpen source: https://pompeiisites.org/en/boscoreale-en/antiquarium-sala-i/
Official exhibition description checked; it is not a recipe. Inventory 84595 and the stamped specimen have not been matched.
- CDC: Raw Flour and DoughOpen source: https://www.cdc.gov/food-safety/foods/no-raw-dough.html
General advice against eating raw flour or dough and for thorough cooking; it does not prescribe 95°C for this bread.